Iranian officials have warned that Tehran will reassess elements of its foreign policy if the International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors passes another resolution against Iran, such as any seen as politically motivated or repetitive, such as passing resolutions against them repeatedly. Iran would review diplomatic posture toward states backing such measures.
As IAEA Board prepares to discuss monitoring concerns and unresolved safeguards issues related to Iran’s nuclear program, several Western governments have expressed support for a formal resolution urging Tehran to enhance cooperation with inspectors; Iran disagrees, maintaining that such pressure undermines ongoing technical talks while creating tensions without good reason.
Tehran Critiques Draft Resolution As Unconstructive
Speaking to local media, the Deputy Foreign Minister stated that another anti-Iran resolution will do nothing but damage bilateral ties between countries supporting it and Iran. He called the draft as “counterproductive”, noting recent exchanges between Iranian nuclear experts and IAEA officials.
Tehran maintains that it has already provided clarifications through technical channels, while political pressure in the form of resolutions disrupts this process. According to Iran’s Deputy FM, they see no justification in repeating measures from previous years since those resolutions did not lead to significant advancement.
Potential Diplomatic Consequences
Iran will review certain foreign policy decisions if the resolution passes, according to Iran’s deputy foreign minister. Without giving specifics as to which ones, analysts believe such reviews could include adjustments in diplomatic engagement levels, cooperation levels and regional coordination with states involved in pushing it through.
Iran has repeatedly issued similar warnings in past disputes with the agency, often using diplomatic recalibration as a method to express displeasure without immediately escalated the situation. According to observers, Tehran’s latest comments indicate its concern that another critical resolution could affect international opinion at an important moment for regional diplomacy.
IAEA Board Weighs Its Options
The IAEA Board of Governors meets several times each year to assess compliance issues among member states. While some delegations support a firm stance on transparency, others feel formal resolutions may hinder ongoing engagement and further isolate Iran’s nuclear program. Countries opposed to formal resolutions often argue technical dialogue remains their best tool in solving questions about Iran’s nuclear program.
Diplomats involved in these discussions say the draft resolution remains open for negotiation and potential amendments could occur at this stage. Voting will depend on who sits on key boards.
Iran Highlights Ongoing Technical Cooperation
Iran officials maintain that, despite criticisms of their proposed resolution, discussions with the IAEA have continued in recent months. Tehran maintains that technical engagement rather than political statements is the best way to deal with safeguard issues.
Iran plans to meet its obligations under international agreements and expects the IAEA process to remain professional and free of external political influence, according to Iran’s Deputy FM. He indicated Tehran remains open to constructive cooperation provided it respects mutually.
International Reactions Remain Reserved
Countries monitoring this issue have issued calls on both sides to avoid actions which might escalate tensions further. European governments have highlighted Iran’s need for greater transparency while emphasizing the significance of maintaining an effective dialogue with this agency.
Regional analysts emphasize the significance of Iran’s diplomatic approach in the coming weeks. The IAEA Board decision–whether to issue a resolution or pursue continued engagement without formal measures–will shape Iran’s next diplomatic step.
As the Board of Governors meets for their next session, speculation over a possible new resolution has added further uncertainty into an already fragile diplomatic atmosphere. Iran’s warning that they may reevaluate their foreign policy signals that any result could alter regional dynamics as well as future collaboration with international institutions.